Hi. I’m Ruth Lindley and I’m happy to get the chance to tell you how to solve a significant problem in refining in a relatively simple and straightforward manner. The problem is ammonia slip.

TypicalNOxNitrogen oxides result from the combustion process in turbines, crackers, combustion engines, boilers, and other locations within a plant. NOX is a powerful pollutant, so it is important to control and contain NOX emissions. Both selective catalytic and selective non-catalytic reduction (SCR and SNCR) are techniques used worldwide to remove NOX. However, this process can result in a byproduct of unreacted ammonia, or ammonia slip. Continuous measurement and monitoring of ammonia slip can be a challenge to ensure sample integrity is maintained, especially in high-dust, high-temperature applications. But regardless of the complexity, to adhere to environmental guidelines, operators must balance using the precise amount of ammonia – not enough ammonia results in waste, too much can lead to emissions.

So how to solve the ammonia slip problem? The answer is QCL/TDL laser technology. (You may not have been expecting that!) In fact, capable, fast Rosemount QCL/TDL technology delivers the needed measurement precision (0–100 ppm) to ensure production is at its optimum and avoid overdosing issues that result in both economic and environmental problems and cost.

Quantum Cascade Lasers monitor ammonia slip to avoid the formation of damaging ammonia salts downstream or emission of 5100captionammonium chloride or gaseous ammonia, and the regulator fines and penalties that result. Here are some of the benefits of Quantum Cascade Lasers in this challenging application –

  • Interference-free monitoring of the presence of ammonia slip in the toughest environments
  • Thousands of measurements per second are recorded using patented laser chirp techniques to ensure identification of even trace levels of ammonia
  • Ammonia slip detection and insight into the efficiency of the plant’s NOX reduction system resulting from real-time measurement and analysis
  • Rugged, modular design delivers outstanding reliability and measurement stability in extreme operations
  • Monitoring of up to twelve critical component gases for all industrial applications, toxic gas detection, and plant-wide emissions monitoring
  • No consumables, no calibration, and no in-field enclosure or shelters reduce cost and simplify maintenance and upgrades

For additional information on the specific QCL/TDL laser products that might work for you, click HERE.

The QCL/TDL laser solution to ammonia slip may seem almost too good to be true – but it’s real and operating in plants worldwide. It’s time for all of us to adjust our thinking on the ammonia slip issue, accepting that there is a better way to overcome it efficiently, reliably, and cost-effectively.

Have thoughts or questions about QCL/TDL laser technology? Post them HERE!


By Amanda Gogates, Product Manager for Quantum Cascade Laser Analyzers, Emerson Process Management

You may have seen a few stories already on the innovative QCL laser technology. That technology has now been successfully implemented in Emerson’s Rosemount™ CT5100 continuous gas analyzer. It is the world’s only hybrid analyzer to combine Tunable Diode Laser (TDL) and Quantum Cascade Laser (QCL) measurement technologies for process gas analysis and emissions monitoring. The CT5100 provides the most comprehensive analysis available (down to sub ppm) for detecting a range of components, while simplifying operation and significantly reducing costs. The CT5100 can measure up to 12 critical component gases and potential pollutants in a single system – meeting local, state, national, and international regulatory requirements.

But if you’re thinking that the CT5100 is remarkable but “bleeding edge” technology that your application can’t afford – think again. The Rosemount CT5100 operates reliably with no consumables, no in-field enclosure, and a simplified sampling system that does not require any gas conditioning to remove moisture – truly “next generation” technology which chartsaves you money at every turn. The CT5100 is a unique combination of advanced technology and rugged design, and is highly reliable. Its patented laser chirp technique expands gas analysis in both the near- and mid-infrared range, enhancing process insight, improving overall gas analysis sensitivity and selectivity, removing cross interference, and reducing response time. This laser chirp technique produces sharp, well-defined peaks from high resolution spectroscopy that enables specificity of identified components with minimum interference and without filtration, reference cells, or chemometric manipulations.

The rugged Rosemount CT5100 analyzer features –

QCL-Image-CT5100-Ex-160420

  • Multi-laser, hybrid QCL/TDL configuration for up to 12 measurements simultaneously per analyzer
  • Accurate and sensitive gas measurement
  • Excellent linearity of response and repeatability
  • Fast and continuous gas measurements using the patented chirp technique
  • Low maintenance and low lifetime costs
  • No long-term drift due to inherent stability of spectroscopic measurement technique
  • Continuous health diagnostic reporting
  • Embedded ARM processor for fully autonomous operation
  • Modular architecture is easily serviceable and upgradeable in the field
  • Superior spectral analysis to eliminate cross-interference and improve measurement accuracy
  • Intuitive, simple front-panel user interface allows access to all instrument functions

Give your Emerson representative a call and discuss the potential of the CT5100 in your process gas analysis, continuous emissions monitoring, and ammonia slip applications. This could be a whole new solution to some costly problems. Click HERE for more information on the CT5100.

17 May, 2016  |  Written by  |  under Boilers, Combustion


 

By Neil Widmer, Business Development Manager, Emerson Process Management

Recently, Bob Sabin of Emerson Process Management presented an article on “4 Key Measurements for Boiler Control Performance” in Flow Control. The purpose of boiler control is to achieve safe and reliable operation and optimized performance with respect to output, operational cost, and by-product emissions. His article emphasizes how the foundation of optimal control rests in the quality of measurement and actuation field devices as shown in Figure 1 below. The four keys of boiler control are drum level, fuel flow, air flow, and flue gas oxygen (O2).

Figure1goodFlue gas O2 measurement was suggested to be the most critical parameter for maintaining boiler safety, maximizing thermal efficiency, and minimizing emissions. With insufficient combustion air, indicated by low O2, incomplete combustion can occur and generate hazardous air pollutants and fuel conversion efficiency losses. On the other hand, excess combustion air, indicated by high O2, reduces thermal efficiency, can limit output and increase emissions of nitrogen oxides pollutants. Non-optimal O2 operation can also increase fouling and slagging, corrosion, erosion, thermal degradation, and other boiler reliability and availability losses.

An accurate and fast response time O2 measurement is ideal to support optimal combustion control. The industry standard O2 measurement technique is with a zirconia oxide (ZrO2) sensor. O2 sensors are housed in probes that can be inserted directly into high-temperature flue gas to provide a continuous and near instantaneous response to flue gas conditions. These probes are called in situ combustion O2 probes. Probes should be located close to the furnace exit to improve response time and, for induced draft boilers, to avoid air in-leakage that can occur at duct joints, air preheaters, air pollution control devices, and fans.

Figure2The O2 probe location is selected to measure a representative average O2 level exiting the furnace. Due to stratification of fuel and air within a burner and from burner to burner, a single measurement may not always provide adequate indication of the average furnace exit O2 levels. (See Figure 2) In highly stratified multi-burner facilities, multiple O2 probes can be used. Some large power generation boilers may have 20-24 O2 probes per boiler. However, on a single-burner industrial or commercial boiler, one O2 sensor may be sufficient as long as burner stratification is not an issue. Best practice however is to install a redundant O2, especially when O2 measurement is used to “trip” or shutdown the boiler.

With the importance of the flue gas O2 measurement, O2 probe reliability and accuracy is critical. Emerson’s Rosemount in situ O2 probes have set the standard in reliability and today’s products feature automatic calibration and other diagnostics to ensure reliability and accuracy for optimal boiler combustion control. More information on this technology can be found HERE.

To improve boiler control, it’s important to have a good base of instrumentation and actuations devices. The full article in Flow Control can be viewed HERE.


The global dairy industry is growing, and one of the dairy producers’ biggest challenges is to maintain high product quality, while also increasing efficiency and minimizing waste and downtime. Recently Philip Edwards wrote an article on this topic for What’s New in Food Technology and Manufacturing titled, “Conductivity Measurement: A Hidden Key to Dairy Industry Success.” Below is an excerpt from this piece:

NZCattle2_lessgreenTo ensure this consistent product quality, the equipment used in the manufacturing of dairy products is not only made from the highest grade of material, but also needs to be cleaned and maintained in such a way as to minimize any possible contamination when changing from one product to another or from one batch to another. This process is called CIP (clean-in-place).

To remain competitive, it is important to minimize production downtime without compromising on the safety and quality of the end product. In the CIP process, conductivity measurement is used to determine how effectively equipment has been cleaned and flushed. Conductivity in CIP picks up the change in the electric conductivity of a sample stream to indicate when a flushing process has started and ended. On a rinse cycle, for example, low conductivity indicates that all chemicals in the process stream have been flushed out and it’s ready for the next batch of product.

An Interesting Case History
A major global dairy company with plants around the world was experiencing challenges with its liquid analytical systems, particularly as related to CIP. CIP systems thoroughly clean wetted components such as tanks, vessels, fermenters, process lines and inline sensors. The CIP process controlled the flow of pre-rinse, wash and post-rinse cycles, which include caustic rinse, acid rinse and water rinse cycles.

Conductivity sensors are a critical component in the design of CIP systems. The various cleaning solutions have more conductivity than the water used for flushing and final rinse. Since many systems are a ‘re-used design,’ the sensor can monitor the strength of cleaning solutions as chemicals get used up through successive cleaning cycles. Conductivity measurements can indicate the need for replenishment.

Any sensors that have to withstand CIP and sterilization must be able to function under very harsh conditions — not a simple requirement for a sensitive analytical sensor. The dairy company was experiencing up to a 50% failure rate on sensors each year, at an approximate cost of $1,200 per sensor. Much worse, however, was the cost of plant downtime — up to $100,000 per hour. The significant failure rate called the reliability of every sensor into question after a short usage period. As a preventive measure, every conductivity sensor was replaced at the end of the season, which required another CIP cycle to be performed, adding even more costs and delay to production. It was preferable, however, to the possible dumping of milk product that would have to occur in the event of a sensor failure during processing.

To learn more about the unique solution the dairy producer implemented to overcome these challenges, click HERE to read the full story.


by Bonnie Crossland, product marketing manager – gas chromatographs, Rosemount Analytical

Whether your gas chromatograph (GC) is used for custody transfer measurement or process control, it is critical to know your GC is providing accurate data and operating as it should. Validation is the testing of the correct calibration and operation of the GC. Many times we have heard customers say they run the calibration gas as an unknown to validate the GC – however, this is not an effective method. This only shows that the GC is doing what it is told. The GC will always read what it was forced to read in the morning calibration run. If the GC is set up incorrectly, has an issue, or the calibration gas blend is bad, the daily calibration may hide the issue and result in inaccurate analysis for the sample stream.

The validation of the GC can be completed in three steps:

  1. Validate the operation of the GC for the previous period
  2. Validate the current accuracy of the GC
  3. Check for changes in operation that may affect future reliability

Validating the operation of the GC for the previous period is done by checking alarm logs, event logs, and un-normalized total trend for the past 30 days. Reviewing the logs will yield clues as to whether the GC was running correctly. All alarms during the period should be investigated and the cause determined before moving to step 2.

Validating the current accuracy of the GC is done by confirming that the As Found calibration is correct, and then observing the correct operation and repeatability of the GC. Check the latest calibration report to be sure that the calibration gas concentrations entered into the GC match the certificate of the calibration gas cylinder. For natural gas applications, you will check the calibration report for Response Factor Order, Response Factor Deviation, and Retention Time Deviation. Once the existing calibration of the GC is confirmed to be accurate, run the GC through a calibration cycle. Check the results of the analysis of the calibration gas before and after the calibration cycle for repeatability. If everything looks good, move onto step 3.

The third and last step is to check for changes in operation that may affect future reliability of the GC. This is best accomplished by checking the retention times of the individual components peaks over the last 30 days. Overtime, retention times gradually increase from contamination of the analytical flow path. This is called Retention Time Drift and it can cause two issues – incorrect peak detection and incorrect component separation. The current calibration chromatogram is compared to the chromatogram from 30 days ago to assess the amount of drift that has occurred. This information is used to make a judgment on the likely amount of drift to occur over the next 30 days. If the drift will not impact peak detection or component separation, validation is completed. If the drift will impact peak detection or component separation, the GC should undergo planned maintenance during the next 30 days.

For more information on validating the operation of your gas chromatograph, click HERE to view the recorded webinar, “Validating the Operation of Your Gas Chromatograph,” the first in a new series of FREE webinars from Rosemount that we’ve prepared to help you get optimum ROI from your gas chromatographs. This new educational webinar series is called “Maximizing Your Gas Chromatograph’s Capabilities” and is hosted by Emerson’s top analyzer experts who will be covering the most critical aspects of the GC, sharing best practices, and addressing users’ frequently asked questions and challenges faced in the field.

Click HERE to register for this FREE new webinar series today! Next ones up include:

  • Webinar #2 – April 21: “Communicating with Your Gas Chromatograph Through Modbus: RS-2332, RS-485, or Ethernet”
  • Webinar #3 – June 16: “Installation Considerations for the Rosemount™ 370XA Gas Chromatograph”
  • Webinar #4 – August 11: “Maintaining Your Gas Chromatograph at Optimal Performance Levels”
  • Webinar #5 – October 20: “Sample Handling System Considerations for Your Gas Chromatograph”

And if you end up missing any, recorded versions will be available for all.